ChipSat (Sprite)

Also known as Sprite, KickSat, Femtosatellite

Gram-scale satellites built on a single circuit board. Cornell’s 4 g Sprites were released by the hundred from the KickSat-2 carrier in 2019 and sent data from orbit; in 2025 a PocketQube hosted a ChipSat of its own.

Document
SQ-FF-005
Updated
Reading time
3 min
In this tab

Definition

A ChipSat squeezes every function of a satellite (power, sensing, computing and radio) onto one small circuit board. The best-known example is the Sprite, developed at Cornell University under Mason Peck: a board of about 3.5 cm that weighs 4 grams[1].

The KickSat missions

To carry Sprites into orbit, the KickSat project led by Zachary Manchester built a 3U CubeSat carrier, funded through a crowd-funding campaign[2]. The first attempt, KickSat-1, was launched on SpaceX CRS-3 on 18 April 2014, but a radiation-induced reset of its master clock pushed back the release timer, and the carrier re-entered on 14 May 2014 without releasing its Sprites[3].

KickSat-2 launched on Cygnus NG-10 on 17 November 2018, separated from Cygnus at about 300 km on 13 February 2019 and released 105 Sprites on 18 March 2019. The first signals arrived the following night, and the Sprites re-entered within days, as designed[3].

A ChipSat on a PocketQube

In January 2025 the 185 g PocketQube POQUITO of the University of Luxembourg carried an independent ChipSat and demonstrated the first visible-light link between a PocketQube and a ChipSat[4]. The mission pairs the two smallest classes: the PocketQube provides power, radio and attitude, the ChipSat a free-flying node a few grams heavy[5].

Why it matters

The Sprites showed that the parts cost of a satellite can fall below a hundred dollars and that many nodes can be released at once and heard on a single channel. The approach points to multi-point networks for atmospheric and space-weather measurements, and to disposable probes in planetary exploration.

Sprite

PropertyValue
Board≈3.5 × 3.5 cm (1.4 in square)
Mass4 g
Processor and radioMicrocontroller and radio on one chip (TI CC430F5137)
PowerSolar cells on the board
CommunicationsShort packets in the 400 MHz region at milliwatt level
SensorsA few on-board sensors

A milliwatt transmitter can close a link from only at very low data rates and with spread-spectrum processing gain. Compared with the 0.5 W of a typical 1P transmitter the gap exceeds 20 dB, which means a data rate more than a hundred times lower for the same margin. The link budget article shows how each term scales.

Tracking

A board a few centimetres across is far below the size that radars track routinely. The KickSat-2 Sprites were therefore released very low and re-entered within days; long-lived ChipSat missions raise regulatory concerns about tracking and collision risk.

Lifetime of a 4 g Sprite tumbling flat-side-on and of a 1P, moderate solar activity
Form factorMass (kg)Ballistic parameter (m²/kg)From 250 kmFrom 300 kmFrom 350 kmFrom 400 km
Sprite0.000.3946< 1 days< 1 days2 days7 days
1P0.250.03302 days9 days28 days3 months

Kennewell density model, drag coefficient 2.2, mean tumbling area A_tot/4, re-entry at 180 km, spacecraft at the mass limit of its standard. Solar activity: low F10.7 = 70 sfu, Ap = 6; moderate 140 sfu, Ap = 12; high 210 sfu, Ap = 18.

Attitude and power

Sprites have no attitude control. As the board turns, both the solar input and the antenna gain change continuously, so the mission must work with intermittent power and an intermittent link.

Radiation

KickSat-1 showed that a single controller without redundancy can lose a whole mission to one radiation-induced reset. Even at the gram scale, critical timers deserve an independent hardware path.

References

  1. [1]Kacapyr, S. (2019). Cracker-sized satellites demonstrate new space tech. Cornell Chronicle.news.cornell.edu
  2. [2]Manchester, Z., Peck, M., & Filo, A. (2013). KickSat: a crowd-funded mission to demonstrate the world’s smallest spacecraft. In: 27th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites (SSC13-IX-5).
  3. [3]Wikipedia. (2026). KickSat.en.wikipedia.org(accessed 20 October 2026)
  4. [4]nadir lab. (2026). PocketQube-class picosatellites: architecture, flight heritage, and a multi-method post-flight analysis of Grizu-263A [Preprint]. nadir lab. Research Monographs (SQ-R-001).Read on nadir lab.
  5. [5]Franzese, V., Kanavouras, K., Bruce Rosete, C., Gouvalas, S., Sajjad, N., Alandihallaj, M., Herasimenka, A., & Hein, A. (2025). System design of the POQUITO PocketQube mission. CEAS Space Journal.doi:10.1007/s12567-025-00624-9

Cite this SatWiki entry

@misc{nadirlab2026chipsat,
  author       = {{nadir lab.}},
  title        = {{ChipSat (Sprite)}},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = oct,
  howpublished = {nadir lab. SatWiki SQ-FF-005 (Rev. 3)},
  url          = {https://nadirlab.space/wiki/chipsat/}
}