Propulsion (PROP)
Also known as PROP, Micropropulsion, Thrusters
Changes or holds the orbit. Small satellites fly cold-gas, electrothermal, green monopropellant and electrospray thrusters; for PocketQubes, holding a low orbit needs micronewton thrust from a few tens of grams, a combination not yet demonstrated.
- Document
- SQ-SS-006
- Updated
- Reading time
- 6 min
In this tab
Definition
A propulsion system expels mass to change the velocity, and therefore the orbit, of a spacecraft. In small satellites its main uses are holding altitude against drag, phasing the members of a constellation, formation flying, collision avoidance and lowering the orbit at the end of the mission. Dumping momentum from is a secondary job.
Technology families
Cold-gas systems are simple, mature and safe, but their total impulse is modest. Electrothermal thrusters (resistojets) heat the propellant electrically to raise the specific impulse; some simple designs run straight from the spacecraft bus. Electrospray thrusters accelerate ionic liquids, or in FEEP thrusters low-melting metals such as indium and gallium, in an electric field and reach specific impulses of thousands of seconds. Propellant safety is one of the main reasons propulsion remains rare on low-cost CubeSats[1].
Flight examples
- MarCO (6U, 2018). Trajectory corrections on the way to Mars used eight cold-gas thrusters fed from one common tank of R-236fa, the compressed gas also used in fire extinguishers[2].
- FEEP on a 3U. Enpulsion’s FEEP thruster flew on a Planet Flock 3p CubeSat in an orbit of about 491 × 510 km; flight data agreed well with the commanded thrust of about 220 µN[1].
- Water . The ARM-A system of AuroraSat-1 provides 70 N·s of total impulse from 70 g of water through six resistojets[1], an effective specific impulse of about 100 s.
Propulsion and PocketQubes
Propulsion is regarded as the main enabling technology for future PocketQubes, and the constraint is quantitative[3]. MEMS fabrication is the main route to fitting a thruster into 50 mm boards[4]. TU Delft developed two water-based micro-resistojet concepts, a vaporizing-liquid microthruster and a low-pressure microthruster[5], and allocated Delfi-PQ a propulsion payload with a wet mass below 75 g, a peak power of 4 W and an envelope of 42 × 42 × 30 mm[6].
At the smallest end, the open-source AIS-gPPT3-1C pulsed-plasma module (34 g, 40 × 38 × 24 mm) produced an impulse bit of about 0.65 µN·s, roughly 0.2 µN at 0.33 Hz, before development stopped because sub-joule pulsed-plasma thrusters could not deliver useful thrust[7]. AMSAT-EA’s GENESIS PocketQubes, meant to demonstrate a miniature pulsed-plasma thruster, were caught in both Firefly Alpha anomalies[3].
The rocket equation
The velocity change a propulsion system can give depends on its propellant mass and specific impulse through the Tsiolkovsky equation[8]:
where and are the initial and final masses and m/s². Ten times the specific impulse gives ten times the for the same propellant, but electric thrusters pay for it in power and time.
Technologies compared
| Technology | Isp (s) | Thrust | Δv (m/s) | Years of drag make-up at 450 km |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold gasN₂, butane, R-236fa | 40–110 | 10 µN–3.6 N | 16–44 | 0.2–0.4 |
| ElectrothermalResistojets: water or gas heated electrically | 20–350 | 0.1 mN–1 N | 8–140 | 0.1–1.3 |
| Alternative mono- and bipropellantAF-M315E (ASCENT), LMP-103S | 150–310 | 50 mN–22 N | 60–124 | 0.6–1.2 |
| Electrospray and FEEPIonic liquids; indium or gallium in FEEP | 225–3,000 | 20 µN–20 mN | 90–1,201 | 0.9–11.6 |
| Pulsed plasma, vacuum arcAblation of PTFE or a metal cathode | 87–3,200 | 4–500 µN | 35–1,281 | 0.3–12.3 |
Ideal rocket equation, propellant only (tanks, power and thrust level ignored). Holding a 1P at 450 km under high solar activity costs about 104 m/s a year. Ranges from NASA’s State of the Art of Small Spacecraft Technology.
Electric propulsion typically delivers less than 75 mN per kilowatt[1]. A spacecraft that can spare 10 W gets at best about 0.75 mN, so accelerating a 6 kg 3U by 1 m/s takes hours of continuous firing. Reviews of small-spacecraft propulsion give the wider landscape[9][10].
What holding altitude costs
To stay at constant altitude a spacecraft needs a continuous thrust equal to its drag, . With the density model of the PocketQube review, a fully loaded 1P needs[3]:
| Altitude (km) | Drag force (µN) | Δv per year (m/s) | Total impulse per year (N·s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 350 | 1.15–4.64 | 145–586 | 36.2–146.4 |
| 400 | 0.33–1.91 | 42–241 | 10.4–60.2 |
| 450 | 0.10–0.82 | 13–104 | 3.2–26.0 |
| 500 | 0.033–0.37 | 4.2–47 | 1.1–11.7 |
| 550 | 0.012–0.18 | 1.5–22 | 0.4–5.6 |
Ranges run from low to high solar activity; tumbling mean area A_tot/4, drag coefficient 2.2. Solar activity: low F10.7 = 70 sfu, Ap = 6; moderate 140 sfu, Ap = 12; high 210 sfu, Ap = 18.
Ten grams of cold gas, about as much as a 1P could plausibly carry, buys 16–44 m/s: a few months of station-keeping at 450 km under high solar activity, and one to three years when the Sun is quiet.
Lowering the orbit
A single retro-burn that drops the perigee to 250 km brings a spacecraft down within weeks:
| Altitude (km) | Perigee to 250 km (m/s) | Perigee to 180 km (m/s) | Low-thrust spiral to 250 km (m/s) | Propellant for a 1P, Isp 65 s (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 500 | 71 | 91 | 142 | 26.3 |
| 550 | 84 | 105 | 170 | 31.0 |
| 600 | 98 | 118 | 197 | 35.6 |
| 700 | 124 | 144 | 251 | 44.3 |
| 800 | 150 | 170 | 303 | 52.4 |
Single impulsive burn from a circular orbit; a 250 km perigee brings re-entry within weeks. Propellant from the rocket equation for a 250 g 1P with cold gas (Isp 65 s).
Launch safety
The CubeSat Design Specification requires propulsion systems to be designed, integrated and tested to AFSPCMAN 91-710 Volume 3 and to carry at least three inhibits against activation[11]. Pressure vessels and hazardous propellants also bring extra analyses and documents from the launch provider, which is why low-pressure propellants stored as solids or liquids are preferred in small satellites.
Power and heat
The power demand of electric thrusters is comparable with the orbit-average power of a small satellite with body-mounted cells: about 2.4 W for a 1U and half a watt for a 1P. Thrusters therefore run in short windows fed from the battery. The heaters of resistojets and FEEP thrusters also load the thermal design.
Cold propellant
The bulk temperature of a 1P falls below 0 °C in eclipse, so water feed systems need thermal isolation or heater power to avoid freezing; silicon chips with thin-film heaters must survive repeated heating from that cold start, and wetted seals must meet the limits[6].
Thrust direction
A thrust vector that misses the centre of mass produces a disturbance torque. As propellant is used the centre of mass moves, so the must be able to hold the thrust direction during a manoeuvre.
Contamination
Plumes can contaminate solar cells, optics and thermal coatings. For thrusters that use metals or ionic liquids, plume geometry and placement belong in the early design.
The tension at PocketQube scale
Debris mitigation pushes PocketQubes towards low orbits, where they can only operate for long with micronewton-class propulsion that fits in a few tens of grams and draws a few hundred milliwatts. That combination has not yet been demonstrated[3]. The five-year rule article compares propulsion with the alternatives: low release altitudes and drag devices.
References
- [1]NASA Small Spacecraft Systems Virtual Institute. (2026). In-Space Propulsion. State-of-the-Art of Small Spacecraft Technology (2026 edition), Chapter 4. NASA Ames Research Center.nasa.gov(accessed 20 October 2026)
- [2]NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory. (2018). InSight landing press kit: Mars Cube One (MarCO).jpl.nasa.gov
- [3]nadir lab. (2026). PocketQube-class picosatellites: architecture, flight heritage, and a multi-method post-flight analysis of Grizu-263A [Preprint]. nadir lab. Research Monographs (SQ-R-001).Read on nadir lab.
- [4]Silva, M. A. C., Guerrieri, D. C., Cervone, A., & Gill, E. (2018). A review of MEMS micropropulsion technologies for CubeSats and PocketQubes. Acta Astronautica, 143, 234–243.doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.11.049
- [5]Cervone, A., Zandbergen, B., Guerrieri, D. C., De Athayde Costa e Silva, M., Krusharev, I., & van Zeijl, H. (2017). Green micro-resistojet research at Delft University of Technology: new options for Cubesat propulsion. CEAS Space Journal, 9, 111–125.doi:10.1007/s12567-016-0135-3
- [6]nadir lab. (2026). A review of structural, thermal, magnetic and electronic materials in PocketQube-class picosatellites [Preprint]. nadir lab. Research Monographs (SQ-R-002).Read on nadir lab.
- [7]Applied Ion Systems. (2019). AIS-gPPT3-1C propulsion module: first integrated open-source thruster for PocketQubes. Libre Space Foundation community forum.community.libre.space(accessed 20 October 2026)
- [8]Wertz, J. R., Everett, D. F., & Puschell, J. J. (Eds.). (2011). Space Mission Engineering: The New SMAD. Microcosm Press.
- [9]Krejci, D., & Lozano, P. (2018). Space propulsion technology for small spacecraft. Proceedings of the IEEE, 106, 362–378.doi:10.1109/JPROC.2017.2778747
- [10]Lemmer, K. (2017). Propulsion for CubeSats. Acta Astronautica, 134, 231–243.doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.01.048
- [11]The CubeSat Program, Cal Poly SLO. (2022). CubeSat Design Specification, Rev. 14.1 (CP-CDS-R14.1). California Polytechnic State University.nasa.gov
Cite this SatWiki entry
@misc{nadirlab2026propulsion,
author = {{nadir lab.}},
title = {{Propulsion (PROP)}},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
howpublished = {nadir lab. SatWiki SQ-SS-006 (Rev. 3)},
url = {https://nadirlab.space/wiki/propulsion/}
}nadir lab. (2026). Propulsion (PROP). nadir lab. SatWiki (SQ-SS-006, Rev. 3). https://nadirlab.space/wiki/propulsion/
TY - ENCYC AU - nadir lab. TI - Propulsion (PROP) T2 - nadir lab. SatWiki PY - 2026 ET - Rev. 3 C1 - SQ-SS-006 UR - https://nadirlab.space/wiki/propulsion/ ER -