Batteries & energy storage

Also known as Li-ion, LiPo, LiFePO4, 18650

Cylindrical 18650 and pouch lithium-ion / LiFePO4 cells for picosatellites: specific energy, vacuum pouch swelling, 0 °C charge protection and LEO cycle life.

Document
SQ-SS-010
Updated
Reading time
1 min
In this tab

Cell formats in a 50 mm envelope

A PocketQube has an internal board footprint of [1]. A standard cylindrical 18650 cell ( diameter by length, , ) cannot lie flat inside a cube; it fits only along the vertical axis of a , or spacecraft or diagonally with a custom structural bracket[2]. Most designs therefore use flat lithium-polymer (LiPo) pouch cells () or shorter cylindrical cells (14500, 16340, 18350)[3].

Cycle life, vacuum containment and thermal limits

Illustrative empirical 18650 / pouch Li-ion cycle-life model (not calibrated to a specific flight cell) in a 525 km LEO orbit (15.15 orbits/day, 18 °C) vs. depth of discharge and charge cut-off voltage
DoD per eclipseCharge cut-off (V)Usable energy / 9.25 Wh cell (Wh)Cycles to 80% SoHYears to 80% SoH3-year retention
10%4.100.9324,4294.484.4%
15%4.101.3912,8732.376.4%
20%4.101.858,1711.568.3%
20%4.201.854,0850.750.2%
30%4.102.784,3060.851.9%
45%4.204.161,1340.240.0%

Three failure modes require dedicated hardware protection on small satellites[3]:

  1. Vacuum pouch delamination and swelling: Unlike hard-can 18650 cells, laminated aluminium-polymer pouch cells expand under external pressure and gas generation. Flight pouch cells must be clamped between rigid FR-4 or aluminium plates with a controlled preload pad.
  2. Sub-zero lithium plating: Charging below plates metallic lithium onto the graphite anode. A thermistor-controlled heater () and hardware charge inhibit are mandatory when eclipse minimum temperatures approach [2].
  3. Magnetic dipole of steel 18650 cans: Standard 18650 shells are nickel-plated steel and can acquire a remanent dipole after spot welding or vibration, perturbing passive magnetic attitude control[4].

References

  1. [1]Uludag, M. S., Yakut, E., Speretta, S., Radu, S., Chronas-Foteinakis, N., Bouwmeester, J., Menicucci, A., & Gill, E. (2019). Getting the Delfi-PQ ready for multiple launch options. In: International Symposium on Space Technology and Science (ISTS), Fukui (2019-f-08).pure.tudelft.nl
  2. [2]nadir lab. (2026). PocketQube-class picosatellites: architecture, flight heritage, and a multi-method post-flight analysis of Grizu-263A [Preprint]. nadir lab. Research Monographs (SQ-R-001).Read on nadir lab.
  3. [3]NASA Small Spacecraft Systems Virtual Institute. (2026). Power. State-of-the-Art of Small Spacecraft Technology (2026 edition), Chapter 3. NASA Ames Research Center.nasa.gov(accessed 20 October 2026)
  4. [4]nadir lab. (2026). A review of structural, thermal, magnetic and electronic materials in PocketQube-class picosatellites [Preprint]. nadir lab. Research Monographs (SQ-R-002).Read on nadir lab.

Cite this SatWiki entry

@misc{nadirlab2026batteries,
  author       = {{nadir lab.}},
  title        = {{Batteries \& energy storage}},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = oct,
  howpublished = {nadir lab. SatWiki SQ-SS-010 (Rev. 1)},
  url          = {https://nadirlab.space/wiki/batteries/}
}