Turkish small satellites (CubeSats & PocketQubes)

Also known as ITUpSAT1, TURKSAT-3USAT, BeEagleSat, HavelSat, Connecta, Istanbul-1P

From ITUpSAT1 in 2009 to TURKSAT-3USAT, QB50 BeEagleSat/HavelSat, Grizu-263A and commercial IoT constellations: evolution of standard-form-factor nano- and picosatellites in Türkiye.

Document
SQ-MS-008
Updated
Reading time
2 min
In this tab

The CubeSat generation (2009–2020)

Standardized nano- and picosatellite development in Türkiye began at Istanbul Technical University (ITU) with the launch of the ITUpSAT1 aboard PSLV-C14 on 23 September 2009 into a Sun-synchronous orbit[1]. Over the following decade, university laboratories and industry partners expanded across to CubeSat platforms:

  • TURKSAT-3USAT (3U, April 2013, CZ-2D): Built by ITU and TÜRKSAT carrying a VHF/UHF voice transponder and optical camera.
  • BeEagleSat & HavelSat (2U, April–May 2017, Atlas V / ISS NanoRacks): Developed by ITU, HAVELSAN and METU within the European QB50 thermospheric research constellation, deployed from the International Space Station near .
  • UBAKUSAT (3U, 2018) & ASELSAT (3U, 2021): Amateur-transponder and X-band/thermal-imaging demonstrators launched via ISS and Falcon 9 Transporter-1.
  • Plan-S Connecta series (3U–6U, 2022–present): Commercial IoT and Earth-observation CubeSat constellation deployed on Falcon 9 Transporter rideshares.

Transition to the PocketQube scale (2022–2026)

Entry into the PocketQube class began on 13 January 2022 when Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University's student team launched the Grizu-263A () aboard Falcon 9 Transporter-3[2][3], followed in 2023 by Hello Space's commercial and IoT satellites (Istanbul, Hello Test-1, Hello Test-2).

Orbital lifetime of fully loaded spacecraft, moderate solar activity
Form factorMass (kg)Ballistic parameter (m²/kg)From 400 kmFrom 500 kmFrom 525 kmFrom 600 kmFrom 700 km
1P0.250.03303 months20.4 months2.7 years10.1 years49 years
3P0.750.02983 months22.6 months3.0 years11.2 years54 years
1U2.000.01805 months3.1 years5.0 years18.6 years90 years
3U6.000.01436 months3.9 years6.2 years23 years> 100 years

Kennewell density model, drag coefficient 2.2, mean tumbling area A_tot/4, re-entry at 180 km, spacecraft at the mass limit of its standard. Solar activity: low F10.7 = 70 sfu, Ap = 6; moderate 140 sfu, Ap = 12; high 210 sfu, Ap = 18.

Scale and subsystem choices across two decades

Comparing the first generation of university CubeSats with post-2022 PocketQubes highlights three engineering shifts[2]:

  1. Attitude control: Both the ITUpSAT1 () and the Grizu-263A () relied on passive magnetic attitude control (), whereas QB50 and commercial platforms adopted 3-axis and .
  2. Communications: Early university missions operated beacons in the amateur band; newer commercial CubeSats and PocketQubes pair UHF/ links with S-band downlinks.
  3. Orbital lifetime and the : A CubeSat placed at in 2009 remains in orbit for decades, whereas a PocketQube deployed into a Sun-synchronous decays naturally within —well inside modern five-year post-mission disposal limits.

References

  1. [1]Krebs, G. D. (2023). ITUpSAT 1 — Gunter's Space Page.space.skyrocket.de(accessed 20 October 2026)
  2. [2]nadir lab. (2026). PocketQube-class picosatellites: architecture, flight heritage, and a multi-method post-flight analysis of Grizu-263A [Preprint]. nadir lab. Research Monographs (SQ-R-001).Read on nadir lab.
  3. [3]Libre Space Foundation community forum. (2022). SpaceX F9 Transporter-3, 2022-01-13 15:25 UTC (discussion thread).community.libre.space(accessed 20 October 2026)

Cite this SatWiki entry

@misc{nadirlab2026turkish,
  author       = {{nadir lab.}},
  title        = {{Turkish small satellites (CubeSats \& PocketQubes)}},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = oct,
  howpublished = {nadir lab. SatWiki SQ-MS-008 (Rev. 1)},
  url          = {https://nadirlab.space/wiki/turkish-small-satellites/}
}