CanSat & Suborbital Model Satellites

Also known as CanSat, Model Satellite, ARLISS, Comeback Competition, Suborbital Probe

Suborbital educational spacecraft packaged inside a standard 330 mL beverage can envelope (Ø66 × 115 mm, 300–350 g) or a two-stage container–payload cylinder (Ø125 mm, 600–1,000 g). Proposed by Bob Twiggs in 1998, the CanSat established the pedagogical foundation for both the 1999 CubeSat and 2009 PocketQube standards.

Document
SQ-FF-006
Updated
Reading time
5 min
In this tab

Definition and historical origin

A CanSat is a complete satellite system—electrical power regulation, onboard computer (), barometric and inertial sensors, radio telemetry transceiver, recovery mechanism, and scientific or guidance payload—packaged within the volume of a standard beverage can (, ) or a cylindrical sounding-rocket payload canister (). Rather than entering orbit, a CanSat is lofted by a sounding rocket, captive balloon, or drone to an altitude of above ground level (AGL) and ejected near apogee to execute its mission during atmospheric descent.

The concept was proposed in November 1998 at the University Space Systems Symposium (USSS) in Hawaii by Professor Robert J. (Bob) Twiggs of Stanford University together with Japanese university faculty led by Professor Shinichi Nakasuka (University of Tokyo). Ten months later, on 11 September 1999, the first ARLISS (A Rocket Launch for International Student Satellites) campaign launched 350-gram student CanSats to over the Black Rock Desert, Nevada. Immediately following that inaugural CanSat campaign, Twiggs and Jordi Puig-Suari (Cal Poly) formalized the 1U CubeSat standard (, 1999)[1], and a decade later Twiggs introduced the 1P PocketQube standard (, 2009)[2][3].

Three primary competition architectures

Modern student CanSat and Model Satellite programmes operate across three distinct mechanical and operational tiers:

  1. Standard 330 mL CanSat Class (, ): Adopted by the European Space Agency (ESA CanSat), ESERO-UK, and introductory university tracks. The entire probe fits inside a cylinder without sharp protrusions; a parachute deployed at rocket ejection limits terminal velocity to while the probe transmits atmospheric pressure and temperature telemetry alongside a secondary experiment.
  2. Two-Stage Container–Payload Model Satellite (, ): Used in the American Astronautical Society (AAS) Student CanSat Competition, CNES C’Space, and international university Model Satellite competitions. A protective outer container deploys a stage-1 drogue parachute () at apogee () and subsequently releases an internal science payload at AGL via a non-pyrotechnic mechanism (Nichrome burn-wire or servo pin-puller)[4]. The released payload descends at using a passive autogyro rotor, ram-air parafoil, or reaction-wheel-stabilized camera platform.
  3. Autonomous Comeback & Surface Rover Class (, up to ): Pioneered at ARLISS (Black Rock Desert, apogee) and UNISEC regional events in Japan. After surviving high-speed parachute deployment, the vehicle autonomously navigates back to a designated GPS target coordinate using a dual-servo parafoil, autonomous quadrotor, or detachable surface rover.

Terminal descent velocity and parachute opening shock

During quasi-steady vertical descent through the troposphere, gravitational weight balances aerodynamic drag:

where is the descending mass, is the local air density ( at sea level under ICAO Doc 7488 ISA), is the canopy drag coefficient ( for a flat circular canopy, for a low-oscillation cruciform chute, and for pulled-down-apex toroidal canopies), and is the central spill-hole ratio.

When the sounding rocket ejects the CanSat off-apogee at relative airspeed , the peak opening shock load follows the Knacke–Pflanz method:

where is the infinite-mass opening shock factor and is the Pflanz ballistic mass-ratio reduction factor during canopy inflation time .

Barometric altitude reconstruction and reset immunity

Flight software determines altitude above the launch pad () from static pressure via the tropospheric hypsometric equation referenced to the calibrated launch-pad pressure :

where , , and . To prevent two classic student failure modes—(1) a mid-air MCU brownout resetting to mid-air pressure, and (2) the black-powder ejection pressure spike falsely triggering low-altitude separation—flight firmware must:

  • Store and the current state integer (LAUNCH_WAIT, ASCENT, APOGEE, SEP, LANDED) in non-volatile FRAM or EEPROM so a watchdog or brownout reboot resumes the active flight state immediately;
  • Filter raw MEMS pressure samples (e.g. Bosch BMP388 or BMP390) and require consecutive descending samples after a post-ejection blanking window.

Comparison across suborbital and orbital student classes

ParameterStandard CanSat ()Two-Stage Model Satellite1P PocketQube (Orbital)1U CubeSat (Orbital)
Envelope
Mass limit
Altitude regime troposphere troposphere LEO LEO
Mission duration (+ pad wait) (+ pad wait)
Primary powerPrimary 9 V or 1S/2S LiPo2S LiPo/LiFePO4 + servo railGaAs solar () + Li-ionGaAs solar () + Li-ion
RF link () + video UHF ()UHF/VHF + S/X-band

Interactive tools and CAD templates

Use the CanSat & Model Satellite Engineering Hub or the standalone CanSat Lab Simulator to run parachute and opening-shock calculations, MEMS barometer apogee filter sizing, CSV telemetry link budgets, and Nichrome burn-wire release sizing, or to download .STEP, .DXF, and circular KiCad PCB templates.

References

  1. [1]Puig-Suari, J., Turner, C., & Ahlgren, W. (2001). Development of the standard CubeSat deployer and a CubeSat class PicoSatellite. In: 2001 IEEE Aerospace Conference Proceedings, vol. 1 (347–353).doi:10.1109/AERO.2001.931726
  2. [2]Twiggs, R. J. (2009). Making it small: the PocketQub. CubeSat Developers’ Workshop, San Luis Obispo (archived presentation).web.archive.org(accessed 20 October 2026)
  3. [3]nadir lab. (2026). PocketQube-class picosatellites: architecture, flight heritage, and a multi-method post-flight analysis of Grizu-263A [Preprint]. nadir lab. Research Monographs (SQ-R-001).Read on nadir lab.
  4. [4]nadir lab. (2026). Non-pyrotechnic antenna deployment in PocketQube-class satellites: strain and thermal budgets for NiTi tapes and release actuators [Preprint]. nadir lab. Research Monographs (SQ-R-003).Read on nadir lab.

Cite this SatWiki entry

@misc{nadirlab2026cansat,
  author       = {{nadir lab.}},
  title        = {{CanSat \& Suborbital Model Satellites}},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = nov,
  howpublished = {nadir lab. SatWiki SQ-FF-006 (Rev. 1)},
  url          = {https://nadirlab.space/wiki/cansat/}
}