Passive magnetic attitude control (PMAC)
Also known as PMAC, Passive magnetic stabilization, Hysteresis damping, Magnet and hysteresis rods
A permanent magnet that aligns one axis with the geomagnetic field and soft-magnetic dampers that drain the spin. It needs no power, software or sensors, which is why most 1P PocketQubes use it, but its physics scales badly into a 50 mm cube.
- Document
- SQ-SS-007
- Updated
- 20 Oct 2026
- Reading time
- 11 min
In this tab
Definition#
Passive magnetic attitude control () combines two magnetic parts. A permanent magnet aligns one body axis with the local geomagnetic field, the way a compass needle does. Hysteresis dampers, rods or strips of a soft-magnetic alloy, turn rotational energy into heat as the field component along them cycles, so the spin and the libration around the field line die out[1]. The system has no power supply, software, sensors or moving parts. That is why it is the most common attitude control of 1P and 1.5P PocketQubes, and why it flew on Grizu-263A.
How it works#
As the spacecraft moves along its orbit the field direction turns, roughly twice per orbit relative to an inertial frame, and the magnet drags the stabilized axis along. In a dipole field the inclination of the field line follows , where is the magnetic latitude: the axis lies almost horizontal over the magnetic equator and almost vertical near the poles[1]. The magnet’s restoring torque makes the axis oscillate around the field line with an undamped libration period ; the dampers remove the energy of that oscillation and of the initial spin.
flowchart LR M["Permanent magnet"] -->|"restoring torque m × B"| BODY["Spacecraft body"] BODY -->|"rotation"| ROD["Hysteresis dampers"] ROD -->|"loss per cycle, heat"| BODY EARTH["Geomagnetic field"] --> M EARTH --> ROD
Why a 1P is different#
Methods developed for CubeSats and microsatellites still apply[2][3], but three effects change at 50 mm[1][4]:
- The magnet does not shrink with the spacecraft. Disturbance torques of a 1P are tiny, but the torque of a does not depend on size, so the moment the rules call for stays near a few hundredths to a tenth of an A·m².
- The magnet sits close to everything. The field of a dipole decays as , so at the walls of a 1P it is eight times stronger than at the walls of a 1U. Dampers biased by that field stop working, and magnetometers saturate.
- The dampers are short. Only about 45 mm fit, against 95 mm in a 1U, which lowers dissipation per element, although the much lower inertia more than compensates.
References
- [1]nadir lab. (2026). PocketQube picosatellites: A review of standards, mission trends and miniaturization constraints, with lessons learned from Grizu-263A, Türkiye’s first PocketQube [Preprint]. nadir lab.Read on nadir lab.
- [2]Santoni, F., & Zelli, M. (2009). Passive magnetic attitude stabilization of the UNISAT-4 microsatellite. Acta Astronautica, 65, 792–803.doi:10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.03.012
- [3]Gerhardt, D. T., & Palo, S. E. (2010). Passive magnetic attitude control for CubeSat spacecraft. In: 24th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites (SSC10-VIII-5).
- [4]nadir lab. (2026). Materials engineering for PocketQube picosatellites: A scaling-based review and design guide [Preprint]. nadir lab.Read on nadir lab.
- [5]Sato, M., & Ishii, Y. (1989). Simple and approximate expressions of demagnetizing factors of uniformly magnetized rectangular rod and cylinder. Journal of Applied Physics, 66, 983–985.
- [6]Aharoni, A. (1998). Demagnetizing factors for rectangular ferromagnetic prisms. Journal of Applied Physics, 83, 3432–3434.doi:10.1063/1.367113
- [7]Osborn, J. A. (1945). Demagnetizing factors of the general ellipsoid. Physical Review, 67, 351–357.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.67.351
- [8]Farrahi, A., & Sanz-Andrés, Á. (2013). Efficiency of hysteresis rods in small spacecraft attitude stabilization. The Scientific World Journal, 2013, 459573.doi:10.1155/2013/459573
- [9]Fiorillo, F., Santoni, F., Ferrara, E., Battagliere, M. L., Bottauscio, O., & Graziani, F. (2010). Soft magnets for passive attitude stabilization of small satellites. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 46, 670–673.doi:10.1109/TMAG.2009.2033345
- [10]Alonso, R., & Shuster, M. D. (2002). Complete linear attitude-independent magnetometer calibration. The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 50, 477–490.doi:10.1007/BF03546249
- [11]Coey, J. M. D. (2010). Magnetism and Magnetic Materials. Cambridge University Press.
- [12]Herzer, G. (2013). Modern soft magnets: amorphous and nanocrystalline materials. Acta Materialia, 61, 718–734.
Cite this SatWiki entry
@misc{nadirlab2026pmac,
author = {{nadir lab.}},
title = {{Passive magnetic attitude control (PMAC)}},
year = {2026},
month = oct,
howpublished = {nadir lab. SatWiki SQ-SS-007 (Rev. 1)},
url = {https://nadirlab.space/en/wiki/pmac/}
}nadir lab. (2026). Passive magnetic attitude control (PMAC). nadir lab. SatWiki (SQ-SS-007, Rev. 1). https://nadirlab.space/en/wiki/pmac/
TY - ENCYC
AU - {nadir lab.}
TI - Passive magnetic attitude control (PMAC)
T2 - nadir lab. SatWiki
PY - 2026
ET - Rev. 1
C1 - SQ-SS-007
UR - https://nadirlab.space/en/wiki/pmac/
ER -