DOC // NL-TN-2026-011VECTOR -Z1P / 1U · MATERIALS · ORBITAL
STATUS: PUBLISHED // REV 0.1

Disturbance torques at PocketQube scale

How L⁵, L³ and L⁰ scaling laws invert the environmental torque hierarchy between 1U CubeSats and 1P PocketQubes

Author
nadir lab.
Published
Reading time
1 min
Level
Engineering
Tags
  • Disturbance torques
  • Scaling laws
  • ADCS
  • Magnetic cleanliness
  • PocketQube

Abstract

We evaluate the four environmental disturbance torques—gravity gradient, aerodynamic drag, solar radiation pressure and residual magnetic dipole—for a 50 mm 1P PocketQube across 350 to 700 km altitude and show why residual current loops and battery ferromagnetic cases dominate picosatellite attitude dynamics.

Contents

Scaling laws of the four environmental torques#

When a spacecraft shrinks by a linear factor at constant bulk density (), the four environmental torques scale at different powers of [1]:

  • Gravity-gradient torque (): . Because principal moments of inertia scale as , halving the edge from () to () reduces by a factor of [2].
  • Aerodynamic torque (): . Cross-section and centre-of-pressure offset yield scaling—unless a deployed UHF tape antenna ( at ) introduces an unscaled lever arm[3].
  • Solar radiation pressure torque (): , which sits near for a cube.
  • Residual magnetic torque ( to ): . Current loops on solar panels, nickel-plated battery cans and steel fasteners produce almost regardless of hull size[4].
Worst-case 1P PocketQube disturbance torques vs. altitude (residual dipole 1.5×10⁻³ A·m², ΔI = 1.8×10⁻⁴ kg·m², CP–CM offset 4 mm)
Altitude (km)Gravity gradient (N·m)Aerodynamic (N·m)Solar radiation (N·m)Magnetic residual (N·m)Dominant source
3203.58 × 10⁻¹⁰3.12 × 10⁻⁸5.67 × 10⁻¹¹7.93 × 10⁻⁸Magnetic residual
4003.46 × 10⁻¹⁰7.76 × 10⁻⁹5.67 × 10⁻¹¹7.65 × 10⁻⁸Magnetic residual
5003.31 × 10⁻¹⁰1.36 × 10⁻⁹5.67 × 10⁻¹¹7.32 × 10⁻⁸Magnetic residual
5253.27 × 10⁻¹⁰8.83 × 10⁻¹⁰5.67 × 10⁻¹¹7.24 × 10⁻⁸Magnetic residual
6003.17 × 10⁻¹⁰2.40 × 10⁻¹⁰5.67 × 10⁻¹¹7.01 × 10⁻⁸Magnetic residual
7003.03 × 10⁻¹⁰4.22 × 10⁻¹¹5.67 × 10⁻¹¹6.72 × 10⁻⁸Magnetic residual

Design consequences for 1P attitude control#

Above , a parasitic dipole of generates in the polar geomagnetic field—two orders of magnitude larger than gravity-gradient torque () and an order of magnitude above aerodynamic torque at moderate solar activity. Routing solar-string return paths directly beneath cell interconnects (back-wiring) and replacing nickel-plated steel fasteners with titanium or A4-80 stainless steel are mandatory before sizing or magnets[3].

References

  1. [1]Wertz, J. R., Everett, D. F., & Puschell, J. J. (Eds.). (2011). Space Mission Engineering: The New SMAD. Microcosm Press.
  2. [2]Markley, F. L., & Crassidis, J. L. (2014). Fundamentals of Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control. Space Technology Library, vol. 33. Springer.doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0802-8
  3. [3]nadir lab. (2026). PocketQube picosatellites: A review of standards, mission trends and miniaturization constraints, with lessons learned from Grizu-263A, Türkiye’s first PocketQube [Preprint]. nadir lab.Read on nadir lab.
  4. [4]Bouwmeester, J., Radu, S., Uludag, M. S., Chronas, N., Speretta, S., Menicucci, A., & Gill, E. K. A. (2020). Utility and constraints of PocketQubes. CEAS Space Journal, 12(4), 573–586.doi:10.1007/s12567-020-00300-0

Cite this article

@misc{nadirlab2026disturbance,
  author       = {{nadir lab.}},
  title        = {{Disturbance torques at PocketQube scale}},
  year         = {2026},
  month        = oct,
  howpublished = {nadir lab. nadir lab. technical note SQ-TN-2026-011},
  url          = {https://nadirlab.space/en/articles/disturbance-torques-pocketqube-scale/},
  language     = {english},
  note         = {Licence: CC BY 4.0}
}
DOI
Not assigned
Identifier
SQ-TN-2026-011
Licence
CC BY 4.0